From 37214b0bdf52cf2f742349b22fae73742aeda091 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Jordan Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:07:17 -0500 Subject: configure: Fix errors with AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER/AST_LEAK_SANITIZER When running on a system that does not support or use AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER or AST_LEAK_SANITIZER, the configure script would incorrectly set those constants to a blank value, e.g., 'AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER='. This would cause menuselect to error out, complaining that a blank value is not a valid option. This patch corrects the issue by setting the value to 0 if the options that those constants enable/disable is not found. Change-Id: Ib39814aaf940f308d500c1e026edb3d70de47fba --- configure | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'configure') diff --git a/configure b/configure index 01604e0bb..ff34770a1 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -13612,7 +13612,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13658,7 +13658,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13682,7 +13682,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13727,7 +13727,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13751,7 +13751,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -17614,7 +17614,7 @@ if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then : $as_echo "yes" >&6; } AST_LEAK_SANITIZER=1 else - AST_LEAK_SANITIZER= + AST_LEAK_SANITIZER=0 { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: no" >&5 $as_echo "no" >&6; } @@ -17646,7 +17646,7 @@ if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then : $as_echo "yes" >&6; } AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER=1 else - AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER= + AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER=0 { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: no" >&5 $as_echo "no" >&6; } -- cgit v1.2.3