| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When code imparts a channel into a bridge to swap with another channel, a
ref needs to be held on the swap channel to ensure that it cannot
dissapear before finding it in the bridge.
* The ast_bridge_join() swap channel parameter now always steals a ref for
the swap channel. This is the only change to the bridge framework's
public API semantics.
* bridge_channel_internal_join() now requires the bridge_channel->swap
channel to pass in a ref.
ASTERISK-24649
Reported by: John Bigelow
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4354/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/13@430975 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
Much needed was a way to assign id to objects on creation, and
much change was necessary to accomplish it. Channel uniqueids
and linkedids are split into separate string and creation time
components without breaking linkedid propgation. This allowed
the uniqueid to be specified by the user interface - and those
values are now carried through to channel creation, adding the
assignedids value to every function in the chain including the
channel drivers. For local channels, the second channel can be
specified or left to default to a ;2 suffix of first. In ARI,
bridge, playback, and snoop objects can also be created with a
specified uniqueid.
Along the way, the args order to allocating channels was fixed
in chan_mgcp and chan_gtalk, and linkedid is no longer lost as
masquerade occurs.
(closes issue ASTERISK-23120)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3191/
........
Merged revisions 410157 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@410158 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
Bridges have two new optional properties, a creator and a name.
Certain consumers of bridges will automatically provide bridges that
they create with these properties. Examples include app_bridgewait,
res_parking, app_confbridge, and app_agent_pool. In addition, a name
may now be provided as an argument to the POST function for creating
new bridges via ARI.
(closes issue AFS-47)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3070/
........
Merged revisions 404042 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@404043 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
The cause code needs to be passed from the disconnecting channel to the
bridge peers if the disconnecting channel dissolves the bridge.
* Made the call to an app_agent_pool agent disconnect with the busy cause
code if the agent does not ack the call in time or hangs up before acking
the call.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22042)
Reported by: Matt Jordan
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2772/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@397472 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
This patch changes ARI bridging to allow other channel operations to
happen while the channel is bridged.
ARI channel operations are designed to queue up and execute
sequentially. This meant, though, that while a channel was bridged,
any other channel operations would queue up and execute only after the
channel left the bridge.
This patch changes ARI bridging so that channel commands can execute
while the channel is bridged. For most operations, things simply work
as expected. The one thing that ended up being a bit odd is recording.
The current recording implementation will fail when one attempts to
record a channel that's in a bridge. Note that the bridge itself may
be recording; it's recording a specific channel in the bridge that
fails. While this is an annoying limitation, channel recording is
still very useful for use cases such as voice mail, and bridge
recording makes up much of the difference for other use cases.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22084)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2726/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@396568 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
This patch renames the bridging* files to bridge*. This may seem pedantic
and silly, but it fits better in line with current Asterisk naming conventions:
* channel is not "channeling"
* monitor is not "monitoring"
etc.
A bridge is an object. It is a first class citizen in Asterisk. "Bridging" is
the act of using a bridge on a set of channels - and the API that fulfills that
role is more than just the action.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22130)
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@395378 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
