| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
From reviewboard:
"During blind transfer testing, it was noticed that tests were failing
occasionally because the ARI blind transfer event was not being sent.
After investigating, I detected a race condition in the blind transfer
code. When blind transferring a single channel, the actual transfer
operation (i.e. removing the transferee from the bridge and directing
them to the proper dialplan location) is queued onto the transferee
bridge channel. After queuing the transfer operation, the blind transfer
Stasis message is published. At the time of publication, snapshots of
the channels and bridge involved are created. The ARI subscriber to the
blind transfer Stasis message then attempts to determine if the bridge
or any of the involved channels are subscribed to by ARI applications.
If so, then the blind transfer message is sent to the applications. The
way that the ARI blind transfer message handler works is to first see
if the transferer channel is subscribed to. If not, then iterate over
all the channel IDs in the bridge snapshot and determine if any of
those are subscribed to. In the test we were running, the lone
transferee channel was subscribed to, so an ARI event should have been
sent to our application. Occasionally, though, the bridge snapshot did
not have any channels IDs on it at all. Why?
The problem is that since the blind transfer operation is handled by a
separate thread, it is possible that the transfer will have completed and
the channels removed from the bridge before we publish the blind transfer
Stasis message. Since the blind transfer has completed, the bridge on
which the transfer occurred no longer has any channels on it, so the
resulting bridge snapshot has no channels on it. Through investigation of
the code, I found that attended transfers can have this issue too for the
case where a transferee is transferred to an application."
The fix employed here is to decouple the creation of snapshots for the transfer
messages from the publication of the transfer messages. This way, snapshots
can be created to reflect what they are at the time of the transfer operation.
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4135
........
Merged revisions 427848 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
........
Merged revisions 427870 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/13
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@427873 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
When a blind transfer occurs that is forced to create a local channel
pair to satisfy the transfer request, information about the local
channel pair is not published. This adds a field to describe that
channel to the blind transfer message struct so that this information
is conveyed properly to consumers of the blind transfer message.
This also fixes a bug in which Stasis() was unable to properly identify
the channel that was replacing an existing Stasis-controlled channel
due to a blind transfer.
Reported by: Matt Jordan
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3921/
........
Merged revisions 421537 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
........
Merged revisions 421538 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/13
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@421539 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
This fixes a class of issues where Stasis applications were not made
aware that their channels were being manipulated or replaced by
external entitiessuch as transfers, AMI commands, or dialplan
applications such as Bridge(). Inconsistent information such as
StasisEnd events with unknown channels as a result of masquerades has
also been corrected. To accomplish these fixes, several new fields
were added to blind and attended transfer messages as well as
StasisStart and BridgeAttendedTransfer Stasis events.
ASTERISK-23941 #close
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3865/
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3857/
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3852/
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3816/
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3731/
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3729/
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3728/
........
Merged revisions 420325 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@420338 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
While the vast majority of bridge snapshot creation is locked properly,
there are currently some instances that are not. This adds the missing
locking to ensure bridge state is not malleable during snapshot
creation.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22904)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3415/
Reported by: Matt Jordan
........
Merged revisions 412193 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@412194 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
Original commit message by mmichelson (asterisk 12 r403311):
"This adds channel locks around calls to create channel snapshots as well
as other functions which operate on a channel and then end up
creating a channel snapshot. Functions that expect the channel to be
locked prior to being called have had their documentation updated to
indicate such."
The above was initially committed and then reverted at r403398. The problem
was found to be in core_local.c in the publish_local_bridge_message function.
The ast_unreal_lock_all function locks and adds a reference to the returned
channels and while they were being unlocked they were not being unreffed when
no longer needed. Fixed by unreffing the channels.
Also in bridge.c a lock was obtained on "other->chan", but then an attempt was
made to unlock "other" and not the previously locked channel. Fixed by
unlocking "other->chan"
(closes issue ASTERISK-22709)
Reported by: John Bigelow
........
Merged revisions 404237 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@404260 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
Bridges have two new optional properties, a creator and a name.
Certain consumers of bridges will automatically provide bridges that
they create with these properties. Examples include app_bridgewait,
res_parking, app_confbridge, and app_agent_pool. In addition, a name
may now be provided as an argument to the POST function for creating
new bridges via ARI.
(closes issue AFS-47)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3070/
........
Merged revisions 404042 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@404043 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
........
Merged revisions 403398 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@403404 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
This adds channel locks around calls to create channel snapshots as well
as other functions which operate on a channel and then end up
creating a channel snapshot. Functions that expect the channel to be
locked prior to being called have had their documentation updated to
indicate such.
........
Merged revisions 403311 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@403314 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
This change prevents channels used as implementation details from
leaking out to ARI. It does this by preventing creation of JSON blobs
of channel snapshots created from those channels and sanitizing JSON
blobs of bridge snapshots as they are created. This introduces a
framework for excluding information from output targeted at Stasis
applications on a consumer-by-consumer basis using channel sanitization
callbacks which could be extended to bridges or endpoints if necessary.
This prevents unhelpful error messages from being generated by
ast_json_pack.
This also corrects a bug where BridgeCreated events would not be
created.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22744)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2987/
Reported by: David M. Lee
........
Merged revisions 403069 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/12
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@403070 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
occurring.
* BridgeEnter now contains the unique ID of the channel that is to be swapped out, if applicable.
* There is a ParkedCallSwap event that is sent when a parked channel has a new channel take its place.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22193)
reported by Mark Michelson
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2712
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@396107 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
In working with res_stasis, I discovered a significant limitation to
the current structure of stasis_caching_topics: you cannot subscribe
to cache updates for a single channel/bridge/endpoint/etc.
To address this, this patch splits the cache away from the
stasis_caching_topic, making it a first class object. The stasis_cache
object is shared amongst individual stasis_caching_topics that are
created per channel/endpoint/etc. These are still forwarded to global
whatever_all_cached topics, so their use from most of the code does
not change.
In making these changes, I noticed that we frequently used a similar
pattern for bridges, endpoints and channels:
single_topic ----------------> all_topic
^
|
single_topic_cached ----+----> all_topic_cached
|
+----> cache
This pattern was extracted as the 'Stasis Caching Pattern', defined in
stasis_caching_pattern.h. This avoids a lot of duplicate code between
the different domain objects.
Since the cache is now disassociated from its upstream caching topics,
this also necessitated a change to how the 'guaranteed' flag worked
for retrieving from a cache. The code for handling the caching
guarantee was extracted into a 'stasis_topic_wait' function, which
works for any stasis_topic.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22002)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2672/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@395954 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
|
This patch renames the bridging* files to bridge*. This may seem pedantic
and silly, but it fits better in line with current Asterisk naming conventions:
* channel is not "channeling"
* monitor is not "monitoring"
etc.
A bridge is an object. It is a first class citizen in Asterisk. "Bridging" is
the act of using a bridge on a set of channels - and the API that fulfills that
role is more than just the action.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22130)
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@395378 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|
