Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
When an endpoint is created, its messages are forwarded to both the tech
endpoint topic and the all endpoints topic. This is done so that various
parties interested in endpoint messages can subscribe to just the tech
endpoint and receive all messages associated with that particular technology,
as opposed to subscribing to the all endpoints topic. Unfortunately, when the
tech endpoint is created, it also forwards all of its messages to the all
topic. This results in duplicate messages whenever an endpoint publishes its
messages.
This patch resolves the duplicate message issue by creating a new function
for Stasis caching topics, stasis_cp_sink_create. In most respects, this acts
as a normal caching topic, save that it no longer forwards messages it receives
to the all endpoints topic. This allows it to act as an aggregation "sink",
while preserving the necessary caching behaviour.
ASTERISK-25137 #close
Reported-by: Vitezslav Novy
ASTERISK-25116 #close
Reported-by: George Joseph <george.joseph@fairview5.com>
Tested-by: George Joseph <george.joseph@fairview5.com>
Change-Id: Ie47784adfb973ab0063e59fc18f390d7dd26d17b
|
|
This reverts commit 6fca75bb628dfff2ab112e80b0228cf3ac0b8a05.
Change-Id: Ifee026cc63e22c5ac5717c37867a9f036373ae5a
|
|
When an endpoint was created, it's messages were being forwarded to
both the tech endpoint topic and the all endpoints topic. Since
the tech topic was also forwarded to all, this was resulting in
duplicate messages whenever an endpoint published. This patch
causes the endpoint to only forward to the tech topic and lets
the tech topic forward to all.
To accomplish this, the existing stasis_cp_single_create function
(which both creates and forwards) was cloned and split into 2
functions, one that creates the topic and one that sets up the
forwarding. This allows endpoint_internal_create to create
the topic from the endpoint_all cache without forwarding it there,
then allows it to do the forward to the tech's topic.
ASTERISK-25137 #close
Reported-by: Vitezslav Novy
ASTERISK-25116 #close
Reported-by: George Joseph <george.joseph@fairview5.com>
Tested-by: George Joseph <george.joseph@fairview5.com>
Change-Id: I26d7d4926a0861748fd3bdffe316b75b549a801c
|
|
In working with res_stasis, I discovered a significant limitation to
the current structure of stasis_caching_topics: you cannot subscribe
to cache updates for a single channel/bridge/endpoint/etc.
To address this, this patch splits the cache away from the
stasis_caching_topic, making it a first class object. The stasis_cache
object is shared amongst individual stasis_caching_topics that are
created per channel/endpoint/etc. These are still forwarded to global
whatever_all_cached topics, so their use from most of the code does
not change.
In making these changes, I noticed that we frequently used a similar
pattern for bridges, endpoints and channels:
single_topic ----------------> all_topic
^
|
single_topic_cached ----+----> all_topic_cached
|
+----> cache
This pattern was extracted as the 'Stasis Caching Pattern', defined in
stasis_caching_pattern.h. This avoids a lot of duplicate code between
the different domain objects.
Since the cache is now disassociated from its upstream caching topics,
this also necessitated a change to how the 'guaranteed' flag worked
for retrieving from a cache. The code for handling the caching
guarantee was extracted into a 'stasis_topic_wait' function, which
works for any stasis_topic.
(closes issue ASTERISK-22002)
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2672/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@395954 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
|