More ticket #965: Receiving (malformed) re-INVITE with the same Via branch parameter value as previous INVITE would raise assertion (thanks Daniel Nanassy for the report)

 - added the SIPp XML scenario to reproduce this


git-svn-id: http://svn.pjsip.org/repos/pjproject/trunk@2953 74dad513-b988-da41-8d7b-12977e46ad98

1 files changed, 173 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/pjsua/scripts-sipp/uac-reinvite-bad-via-branch.xml b/tests/pjsua/scripts-sipp/uac-reinvite-bad-via-branch.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ed825c9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/pjsua/scripts-sipp/uac-reinvite-bad-via-branch.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>

+<!DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM "sipp.dtd">

+

+<!-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or      -->

+<!-- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as     -->

+<!-- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the -->

+<!-- License, or (at your option) any later version.                    -->

+<!--                                                                    -->

+<!-- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,    -->

+<!-- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of     -->

+<!-- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the      -->

+<!-- GNU General Public License for more details.                       -->

+<!--                                                                    -->

+<!-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License  -->

+<!-- along with this program; if not, write to the                      -->

+<!-- Free Software Foundation, Inc.,                                    -->

+<!-- 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307 USA             -->

+<!--                                                                    -->

+<!--                                                                    -->

+

+<!-- Re-INVITE with bad Via branch (it has the same branch as the

+     previous INVITE (ticket #965) will cause assertion

+-->

+     

+

+<scenario name="UAC re-INVITE with bad Via branch">

+  <send retrans="500">

+    <![CDATA[

+

+      INVITE sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0

+      Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=z9hG4bKPj-1

+      From: sipp <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number]

+      To: sut <sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>

+      Call-ID: [call_id]

+      CSeq: 1 INVITE

+      Contact: sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]

+      Max-Forwards: 70

+      Subject: Performance Test

+      Content-Type: application/sdp

+      Content-Length: [len]

+

+      v=0

+      o=Tester 234 123 IN IP4 127.0.0.1

+      s=Tester

+      c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1

+      t=0 0

+      m=audio 17424 RTP/AVP 0 101

+      a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

+      a=sendrecv

+

+    ]]>

+  </send>

+

+  <recv response="100"

+        optional="true">

+  </recv>

+

+  <recv response="180" optional="true">

+  </recv>

+

+  <!-- By adding rrs="true" (Record Route Sets), the route sets         -->

+  <!-- are saved and used for following messages sent. Useful to test   -->

+  <!-- against stateful SIP proxies/B2BUAs.                             -->

+  <recv response="200" rtd="true">

+  </recv>

+

+  <!-- Packet lost can be simulated in any send/recv message by         -->

+  <!-- by adding the 'lost = "10"'. Value can be [1-100] percent.       -->

+  <send>

+    <![CDATA[

+

+      ACK sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0

+      Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=z9hG4bKPj-2

+      From: sipp <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number]

+      To: sut <sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>[peer_tag_param]

+      Call-ID: [call_id]

+      CSeq: 1 ACK

+      Contact: sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]

+      Max-Forwards: 70

+      Subject: Performance Test

+      Content-Length: 0

+

+    ]]>

+  </send>

+

+

+  <!-- Re-INVITE with Via branch value the same as previous INVITE -->

+  <send retrans="500">

+    <![CDATA[

+

+      INVITE sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0

+      Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=z9hG4bKPj-1

+      From: sipp <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number]

+      To: sut <sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>[peer_tag_param]

+      Call-ID: [call_id]

+      CSeq: 2 INVITE

+      Contact: sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]

+      Max-Forwards: 70

+      Subject: Performance Test

+      Content-Type: application/sdp

+      Content-Length: [len]

+

+      v=0

+      o=Tester 234 124 IN IP4 127.0.0.1

+      s=Tester

+      c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1

+      t=0 0

+      m=audio 17424 RTP/AVP 0 101

+      a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

+

+

+    ]]>

+  </send>

+

+  <!-- By adding rrs="true" (Record Route Sets), the route sets         -->

+  <!-- are saved and used for following messages sent. Useful to test   -->

+  <!-- against stateful SIP proxies/B2BUAs.                             -->

+  <recv response="500" rtd="true">

+  </recv>

+

+  <!-- Packet lost can be simulated in any send/recv message by         -->

+  <!-- by adding the 'lost = "10"'. Value can be [1-100] percent.       -->

+  <send>

+    <![CDATA[

+

+      ACK sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0

+      Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=z9hG4bKPj-1

+      From: sipp <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number]

+      To: sut <sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>[peer_tag_param]

+      Call-ID: [call_id]

+      CSeq: 2 ACK

+      Contact: sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]

+      Max-Forwards: 70

+      Subject: Performance Test

+      Content-Length: 0

+

+    ]]>

+  </send>

+

+

+  <pause milliseconds="2000"/>

+

+

+  <!-- The 'crlf' option inserts a blank line in the statistics report. -->

+  <send retrans="500">

+    <![CDATA[

+

+      BYE sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0

+      Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch]

+      From: sipp <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number]

+      To: sut <sip:[service]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>[peer_tag_param]

+      Call-ID: [call_id]

+      CSeq: 3 BYE

+      Contact: sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]

+      Max-Forwards: 70

+      Subject: Performance Test

+      Content-Length: 0

+

+    ]]>

+  </send>

+

+  <recv response="200" crlf="true">

+  </recv>

+

+

+  <!-- definition of the response time repartition table (unit is ms)   -->

+  <ResponseTimeRepartition value="10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 150, 200"/>

+

+  <!-- definition of the call length repartition table (unit is ms)     -->

+  <CallLengthRepartition value="10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 10000"/>

+

+</scenario>

+