summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/AUTHORS
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2009-11-28Add HTTP Digest Authentication to post-reviewDavid Trowbridge
Patch from Ryan Oblak to add support for HTTP Digest Authentication to post-review. It was really trivial given the work already added in for HTTP Basic Authentication. Testing done: This has been tested on my Review Board 1.1 alpha 1 installation with Digest, Basic, and no authentication. Reviewed at http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1265/
2009-11-04Properly represent binary files in patches when using git-svn.Christian Hammond
When adding/changing binary files against a git-svn repository, the binary files would be filtered out of the diff. We now represent binary files properly by faking the information in a diff. Patch by Anthony Cruz. Reviewed at http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1194/
2009-11-03Improve git parent branch detection in post-review.Christian Hammond
This adds improved logic for determining the parent branch used when generating a diff. It will attempt to detect the merge base of the current head, falling back to defaults if necessary. A tracking branch can be manually specified too. The new code attempts the following: 1) Tries to detect the tracking branch for the current HEAD, if possible. 2) If a tracking branch doesn't exist, or is not remote, it will fall back on 'origin/master'. 3) If the --tracking-branch parameter is specified, this branch will be used instead of 'origin/master'. It also provides unit tests for post-review. Right now, these test only GitClient (in pure Git mode), but new tests can be added down the line for the rest of post-review. Patch by Dan Savilonis Reviewed at http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1144/
2009-09-24Support "revision-range" option with gitDavid Trowbridge
Patch from Flavio Castelli. With this patch post-review will support the revision-range option following the syntax explained at http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/#posting-committed-code Testing done: I have tested this new feature locally and it works fine. I have successfully tested the following commands: post-review --revision-range=rev1:rev2 --guess-summary --guess-description post-review --revision-range=rev1:rev2 --guess-description post-review --revision-range=rev1:rev2 post-review --revision-range=rev --guess-summary --guess-description post-review --revision-range=rev Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/1049/
2009-09-10Add Repository UUID support to git-svn.Christian Hammond
This change introduces Repository UUID support to git-svn, allowing Review Board to match repositories by UUID instead of comparing the repository name directly. Patch by Matthew Woehlke. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/1030/
2009-08-22Patch by Dana Lacoste to fix a bug with post-review on Windows where wechipx86
improperly check for the os.uname function. Fixes bug #1280.
2009-05-28Patch by Steven Russell to fix working with Perforce file paths containingchipx86
spaces. Fixes bug #840. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/815/
2009-05-28Add Chris Clark to the authors list.chipx86
2009-04-23Patch by Jeremy Bettis to properly join a SVN repository base path and a ↵chipx86
file path using a "/" instead of "\" on Windows. This fixes bug #939.
2009-04-14Patch by Eric Huss to fix an infinite recursion problem when usingchipx86
post-review with invalid cookies. Fixes bug #808. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/813/
2009-03-29Release rbtools 0.2 beta 1.chipx86
2009-03-27Patch by Raghu Kaippully to fix changesets with binary files in Perforce ↵chipx86
when using post-review. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/787/ Fixes bug #585
2009-03-27Move post-review into a new top-level "rbtools" packagechipx86
Since the dawn of time, post-review has lived in the Review Board tree, despite being a client script and not necessarily being needed on the server. This moves post-review into a new rbtools package, which users will be able to easy_install (easy_install -U RBTools). The simplejson dependency will be fetched, and users won't have to go hunting in SVN for a script. Over time, I'd like to add new scripts into here (such as one to apply a diff from a review request), and further down the road I'd like to create an "rbapi" (or something) package that contains a Python API for talking to a Review Board server, which rbtools (and post-review) will then use. For now, the goal is to just get post-review moved over. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/788/