Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2009-11-05 | Don't depend on simplejson on Python 2.6 eggs. | Christian Hammond | |
We were requiring the simplejson dependency on Python 2.6, despite the fact that Python 2.6 includes json built-in. We no longer depend on simplejson on this version. Fixes bug #1383 | |||
2009-10-13 | Update all URLs to point to the new site. | Christian Hammond | |
2009-09-21 | Release RBTools v0.2 beta 2.release-0.2beta2 | Christian Hammond | |
2009-07-18 | Install post-review as a Python module, with a generated post-review (or | chipx86 | |
post-review.exe) wrapping it. The official way to install post-review now is by installing RBTools. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/916/ | |||
2009-03-29 | Bump the version to 0.2beta2.dev. | chipx86 | |
2009-03-29 | Release rbtools 0.2 beta 1. | chipx86 | |
2009-03-27 | This isn't a release, so don't mark it as such. | chipx86 | |
2009-03-27 | Move post-review into a new top-level "rbtools" package | chipx86 | |
Since the dawn of time, post-review has lived in the Review Board tree, despite being a client script and not necessarily being needed on the server. This moves post-review into a new rbtools package, which users will be able to easy_install (easy_install -U RBTools). The simplejson dependency will be fetched, and users won't have to go hunting in SVN for a script. Over time, I'd like to add new scripts into here (such as one to apply a diff from a review request), and further down the road I'd like to create an "rbapi" (or something) package that contains a Python API for talking to a Review Board server, which rbtools (and post-review) will then use. For now, the goal is to just get post-review moved over. Reviewed at http://reviews.review-board.org/r/788/ |