diff options
author | Matt Jordan <mjordan@digium.com> | 2016-05-11 14:07:17 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matt Jordan <mjordan@digium.com> | 2016-05-11 14:07:17 -0500 |
commit | 37214b0bdf52cf2f742349b22fae73742aeda091 (patch) | |
tree | c4347870ea94e0dab8e6fde9317c6127b86fc8e4 /configure | |
parent | a01ce2b88912cd802bb045e40fe264906e55bc45 (diff) |
configure: Fix errors with AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER/AST_LEAK_SANITIZER
When running on a system that does not support or use AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER
or AST_LEAK_SANITIZER, the configure script would incorrectly set those
constants to a blank value, e.g., 'AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER='. This would
cause menuselect to error out, complaining that a blank value is not a
valid option. This patch corrects the issue by setting the value to 0 if
the options that those constants enable/disable is not found.
Change-Id: Ib39814aaf940f308d500c1e026edb3d70de47fba
Diffstat (limited to 'configure')
-rwxr-xr-x | configure | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
@@ -13612,7 +13612,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13658,7 +13658,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13682,7 +13682,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13727,7 +13727,7 @@ else We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -13751,7 +13751,7 @@ rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext We can't simply define LARGE_OFF_T to be 9223372036854775807, since some C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers incorrectly reject 9223372036854775807. */ -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62)) +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31)) int off_t_is_large[(LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483629 == 721 && LARGE_OFF_T % 2147483647 == 1) ? 1 : -1]; @@ -17614,7 +17614,7 @@ if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then : $as_echo "yes" >&6; } AST_LEAK_SANITIZER=1 else - AST_LEAK_SANITIZER= + AST_LEAK_SANITIZER=0 { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: no" >&5 $as_echo "no" >&6; } @@ -17646,7 +17646,7 @@ if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then : $as_echo "yes" >&6; } AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER=1 else - AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER= + AST_UNDEFINED_SANITIZER=0 { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: no" >&5 $as_echo "no" >&6; } |